|
The experimental
drug Erbitux, viewed by many doctors as a promising treatment
for some cases of advanced colorectal cancer, may not need additional
clinical trials beyond one already underway in Europe.
The drug's
manufacturer, ImClone Systems, announced following a meeting with
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that regulators may be willing
to consider approval of Erbitux on the basis of more complete
data from a trial already completed in the United States as well
as data from a trial being conducted by Merck of Germany.
The FDA two
months ago refused to proceed with ImClone's application for Erbitux,
citing insufficient information about patients included in the
U.S. clinical test of the drug, which had been expected to reach
the market later this year.
Erbitux is
a monoclonal antibody designed to target and bloxk the Epidermal
Growth Factor Receptor, which is expressed on the surface of certain
cancer cells.
ImClone tested
the rug on 120 patients with colorectal cancer who were not responding
to irinotecan, an existing drug, and reported tumor shrinkage
in 22.5 percent of the patients, who were given both Erbitux and
irinotecan.
The European
study is a randomized, multi-center clinical trial evaluating
the combination of Erbitux and irinotecan and Erbitux alone in
patients with irinotecan-refractory colorectal cancer. ImClone
will continue discussions regarding the European study with the
FDA for their review, comments and approval.
"We view
the meeting with the FDA as very productive. The meeting provides
us with direction on an approach and a process for resubmitting
the Erbitux Biologics License Application, which is expected to
include both U.S. and European clinical trial data," said
Samuel D. Waksal, PhD, President and CEO of ImClone.
"We assured
the FDA that we are committed to working closely with them to
resolve issues raised in the Refusal to File letter, and on our
approach moving forward," added Waksal.
If the FDA
were to accept the new approach, analysts said Erbitux could reach
the market from the middle of 2003 to early 2004 -- a year to
18 months later than ImClone's initial expectations, but much
earlier than if new trials had been required.
Other
Sources: ImClone, NY Times, Washington Post
|