|
Spanish researchers
have concluded on the basis of a five-year study of more than
200 patients that laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is preferable
for a variety of reasons to conventional colon cancer surgery.
The researchers,
reporting in The Lancet, said patients who had a laparoscopy-assisted
colectomy (LAC), which uses a few small incisions and a camera-guided
scalpel instead of the standard long incision, had shorter hospital
stays, fewer complications, recovered faster and had a higher
survival rate.
They reported
that LAC patients averaged five days in the hospital compared
to eight days for open colectomy patients. Twelve of the LAC patients
had post-surgical complications compared to 31 of the open colectomy
patients. Colon cancer recurred in 17 percent of the LAC patients
compared to 27 percent of open colectomy patients.The death rate
was 19 percent in the LAC group compared to 27 percent of open
colectomy patients.
"LAC
is more effective than open colectomy for treatment of colon cancer
in terms of morbidity, hospital stay, tumour recurrence, and cancer-related
survival," the researchers at the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona
concluded..
They said
that "if these results are confirmed by ongoing multi-center
trials, laparoscopy-assisted colectomy for treatment could become
the standard approach in patients with colon cancer.","
surgeons at the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona write in the report.
In the U.S.,
the National Cancer Institute sponsoring a multi-center trial
with results expected later this year.
Other
Sources: The Lancet
|