|
Researchers
in Hong Kong report that elderly colorectal cancer patients who
undergo less-invasive laparoscopic surgery tend to fare better
than those who undergo open surgery.
The researchers
at the University of Hong Kong Medical Centre compared the outcomes
for 65 patients with a median age of 75 who had laparoscopic surgery
to outcomes for 89 patients with a median age of 77 who had open
surgery.
While operating
time using the laparoscopic approach tended to be almost an hour
longer (180 minutes versus 135 minutes), they reported in the
Journal of the American College of Surgeons that blood loss was
only half as great in the laparoscopic group and only one patient
in that group died compared to five in the open group.
They also
reported that patients who had laparoscopic surgery had earlier
return of bowel function (3 days versus 4 days), earlier resumption
of solid diet (3 days versus 5 days), shorter hospital stays (7
days versus 9 days), and less cardiopulmonary morbidity (7.7 percent
versus 22.4 percent).
"Laparoscopic
colorectal resection is a safe option for elderly patients and
is associated with more favorable short-term outcomes in terms
of earlier return of bowel function, earlier resumption of diet,
and shorter hospital stay," the researchers concluded. "It
is also associated with less cardiopulmonary morbidity, which
is an important complication after colorectal surgery in the elderly."
Other
Sources: Journal of the American College of Surgeons
|