|
The risk of
perforation of the bowel during a colonoscopy declined during
the 1990s but remains higher than the risk of perforation during
a sigmoidoscopy, according to a report in the Journal of the National
Cancer Institute.
A colonoscopy
is used to check the entire length of the colon for cancer or
precancerous abnormalities, while a similar technique called sigmoidoscopy
is limited to the section of the colon closest to the rectum.
A potential complication from both procedures is perforation,
or damage to the colon wall.
Columbia University
researchers used a database of Medicare beneficiaries to identify
people who underwent at least one colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy
between 1991 and 1998, and then calculated the incidence and risk
of perforation.
Of 39,286
colonoscopies included in the analysis, there were 77 perforations
(1.96 perforations per 1,000 colonoscopies), compared with 31
perforations in 35,298 sigmoidoscopies (0.88 perforations per
1,000 sigmoidoscopies).
"The
two procedures [were] much more similar in overall risk at the
end of the study period than they had been at the beginning,"
the researchers reported. They suggested that the decline in colonoscopy
perforations may have resulted from improvements in technology
and training.
The researchers
found that about 5 percent of those who suffered a perforation
died within 14 days of the procedure.
"The
risk of perforation after colonoscopy is approximately double
that after sigmoidoscopy, but this difference appears to be decreasing,"
the researchers concluded.
Other
Sources: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
|